Availability
Availability is the amount a borrower can currently draw from a revolving credit facility or asset-based loan, calculated as the borrowing base minus outstanding advances and reserves.
Definition
Availability refers to the portion of a revolving credit facility or asset-based lending (ABL) line that a borrower is permitted to draw at any given time. It is not a static number; availability fluctuates based on the value of eligible collateral, outstanding loan balances, and any reserves imposed by the lender. In practical terms, availability represents the gap between the calculated borrowing base and the amount already advanced.
The standard formula is: Availability = Borrowing Base - Outstanding Advances - Reserves. The borrowing base itself is derived by applying advance rates to categories of eligible collateral, most commonly accounts receivable and inventory. Lenders recalculate the borrowing base on a regular cycle, often monthly or weekly for larger facilities, which means availability can shift even when no new draws are made.
Availability is distinct from the total commitment or credit limit on a facility. A business may have a $5 million revolving line of credit, but if the borrowing base only supports $3.2 million and $2 million is already drawn, availability is $1.2 million. This dynamic cap is the defining characteristic of asset-based structures compared to traditional lines of credit where the full commitment is typically accessible regardless of collateral fluctuations.
Lenders may also impose discretionary reserves that reduce availability further. These reserves can reflect concentration risk, dilution in receivables, seasonal adjustments, or general credit concerns. Because reserves are often at the lender's discretion, borrowers should negotiate clear language around when and how reserves can be applied.
Why It Matters
Availability directly determines how much liquidity a business can access on any given day. For companies relying on asset-based revolving facilities to fund operations, payroll, inventory purchases, or contract fulfillment, a sudden drop in availability can create an immediate cash crisis, even when the overall credit facility remains in place. Understanding availability is essential for effective working capital cycle management.
Monitoring availability is also critical for maintaining compliance with financial covenants. Many ABL facilities include a minimum availability covenant, typically requiring the borrower to maintain availability above a specified threshold, often of the total facility commitment. Falling below this threshold can trigger a covenant default, giving the lender the right to freeze further draws, demand additional reporting, or accelerate the loan.
For growing businesses, availability also serves as a planning tool. Because it is tied to collateral values, availability naturally scales with revenue growth: as receivables and inventory increase, the borrowing base expands, and more capital becomes accessible without renegotiating the facility. Conversely, businesses experiencing revenue declines will see availability contract automatically, which makes early monitoring and forecasting essential to avoid liquidity shortfalls.
Common Mistakes
Confusing availability with the credit limit. The total facility size is the maximum possible borrowing amount, not the current amount accessible. A $10 million ABL facility may have only $4 million of actual availability depending on the borrowing base calculation and outstanding draws. Businesses that plan cash flow around the headline facility number rather than actual availability risk overdrawing or missing obligations.
Ignoring discretionary reserves. Lenders can impose reserves that reduce availability without reducing the borrowing base itself. Borrowers who do not negotiate guardrails around reserve application, such as requiring notice periods or capping discretionary reserves at a percentage of the facility, may find availability reduced unexpectedly at the worst possible time.
Failing to monitor availability between borrowing base certificates. The borrowing base is formally recalculated at defined intervals, but the underlying collateral values shift daily. Businesses that only check availability when the lender delivers a borrowing base certificate can be caught off guard by receivable collections, inventory drawdowns, or concentration shifts that erode availability between reporting periods.
Not accounting for receivable dilution. Dilution, which includes credits, returns, disputes, and write-offs, reduces the eligible receivable pool and therefore the borrowing base. Lenders typically apply a dilution reserve when dilution exceeds of gross receivables. Businesses with high return rates or frequent billing disputes may see availability significantly below what raw receivable balances would suggest.
Ready to explore your financing options?
Get Financing OptionsFrequently Asked Questions
How is availability different from a borrowing base?
The borrowing base is the total value of eligible collateral after applying advance rates. It represents the theoretical maximum a lender will support. Availability is the borrowing base minus any outstanding advances already drawn and any reserves the lender has imposed. Think of the borrowing base as the ceiling and availability as the remaining room under that ceiling. If the borrowing base is $5 million, you have $3 million drawn, and the lender holds $500,000 in reserves, your availability is $1.5 million. Both figures move over time as collateral values change and draws are made or repaid.
How often does availability change?
Availability can change daily in practice, though formal recalculation depends on the reporting cycle defined in the credit agreement. Most asset-based lending facilities require borrowing base certificates on a monthly basis, with some larger facilities requiring weekly or even daily reporting. Between formal recalculations, actual availability shifts as the borrower collects receivables, ships new invoices, draws on the line, or makes repayments. Lenders may also adjust reserves at their discretion, which can change availability outside the normal reporting cycle. Sophisticated borrowers maintain internal availability tracking models to forecast liquidity between official borrowing base certificates.
What happens if availability drops below the minimum covenant threshold?
Most ABL facilities include a minimum availability covenant, sometimes called a minimum excess availability requirement. If availability falls below this threshold, the borrower is typically in default or enters a restricted period. Consequences can include the lender imposing dominion over the borrower's cash (requiring all collections to flow through a lender-controlled lockbox), additional reporting requirements such as weekly or daily borrowing base certificates, higher interest rates via a default rate spread, and in severe cases, acceleration of the outstanding balance. The specific remedies depend on the credit agreement. Some agreements provide a cure period, while others trigger restrictions immediately. Maintaining a buffer above the minimum availability covenant is considered a fundamental treasury management practice for ABL borrowers.
Can a borrower increase availability without increasing the facility size?
Yes. Because availability is driven by the borrowing base, a borrower can increase availability by expanding the pool of eligible collateral. Common strategies include accelerating receivable creation through new sales, improving receivable quality by reducing aging and dilution, adding new collateral categories such as inventory or equipment to the borrowing base with lender approval, and reducing outstanding draws by repaying a portion of the balance. Reducing lender-imposed reserves, whether by addressing the underlying concern that prompted the reserve or by negotiating a lower reserve percentage, also frees up availability. Conversely, simply collecting receivables faster without generating new ones will shrink the borrowing base and reduce availability, which is a counterintuitive dynamic that catches some borrowers off guard.
Last reviewed: